<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Software Industry Insights &#187; Seth Godin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.softwareindustryinsights.com/tag/seth-godin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.softwareindustryinsights.com</link>
	<description>Insights into how technology and the outsourcing of R&#38;D are changing the software industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:40:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Switch + Linchpin: More than the Sum of their Parts</title>
		<link>http://www.softwareindustryinsights.com/2010/04/switch-linchpin-more-than-the-sum-of-their-parts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.softwareindustryinsights.com/2010/04/switch-linchpin-more-than-the-sum-of-their-parts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 19:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Gruber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chip and Dan Heath]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linchpin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seth Godin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Switch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.softwareindustryinsights.com/?p=240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
After having recently read Seth Godin’s Linchpin: Are You Indespensible, I’m just finishing up Switch: How to Change Things When Change Is Hard by Chip and Dan Heath.  Both books are great reads by themselves, but I think that adding them together makes a more powerful combination than they are separately.

Godin sets a great vision ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.softwareindustryinsights.com%2F2010%2F04%2Fswitch-linchpin-more-than-the-sum-of-their-parts%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.softwareindustryinsights.com%2F2010%2F04%2Fswitch-linchpin-more-than-the-sum-of-their-parts%2F&amp;source=ggruber66&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;service_api=R_44ab8136c50f7bc78b76393003a90986&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>After having recently read Seth Godin’s <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Linchpin-Are-Indispensable-Seth-Godin/dp/1591843162/ref=pd_sim_b_5">Linchpin: Are You Indespensible</a></em>, I’m just finishing up <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Switch-Change-Things-When-Hard/dp/0385528752/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1271705991&amp;sr=8-1">Switch: How to Change Things When Change Is Hard</a></em> by Chip and Dan Heath.  Both books are great reads by themselves, but I think that adding them together makes a more powerful combination than they are separately.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.softwareindustryinsights.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Linchpin+Switch.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-241 aligncenter" title="Linchpin+Switch" src="http://www.softwareindustryinsights.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Linchpin+Switch-300x179.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="179" /></a></p>
<p>Godin sets a great vision of why it’s important to become indispensable (or at least not first on the firing line when times get tough) in the new economy.  But while he provides general characteristics of what makes a Linchpin and broad suggestions of how to become one, he doesn’t lay out the path (people who have already read <em>Switch</em> get this first clue).  More likely than not it will require a change in an individual’s behaviors to actually become one.  That’s where <em>Switch</em> comes in.</p>
<p>Predictably, and perhaps sadly, I saw many familiar storylines in <em>Switch</em> – some related to companies I’ve worked for and others related to my own work-style.  But <em>Switch</em> gives the reader a framework in which to effect the changes called for in Linchpin – both for themselves and how to create leverage withing their organizations.  The approaches in <em>Switch</em> should be especially useful in cases where you have access to limited resources to move your agenda forward, which I would imagine is pretty standard fare for most people.</p>
<p>Amazon does list both books under the “Customers who bought X also bought Y”, but I didn&#8217;t see a special deal to buy the two books together on Amazon, but I’d suggest that you do anyway.</p>
<p>Have you read <em>Linchpin</em> or <em>Switch</em> yet?</p>
 <img src="http://www.softwareindustryinsights.com/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-feed-statistics/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=240" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.softwareindustryinsights.com/2010/04/switch-linchpin-more-than-the-sum-of-their-parts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The iPad&#8217;s First Commerical</title>
		<link>http://www.softwareindustryinsights.com/2010/03/the-ipads-first-commerical/</link>
		<comments>http://www.softwareindustryinsights.com/2010/03/the-ipads-first-commerical/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Gruber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seth Godin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.softwareindustryinsights.com/?p=176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
This was the only commercial that my wife and I actually watched as we sped thru the Oscars on DVR.  But I was very disappointed.  Apple advertising usually hits it out of the park, but in my opinion this had no impact. It didn&#8217;t spend time really communicating any of the capabilities of the device. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.softwareindustryinsights.com%2F2010%2F03%2Fthe-ipads-first-commerical%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.softwareindustryinsights.com%2F2010%2F03%2Fthe-ipads-first-commerical%2F&amp;source=ggruber66&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;service_api=R_44ab8136c50f7bc78b76393003a90986&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>This was the only commercial that my wife and I actually watched as we sped thru the Oscars on DVR.  But I was very disappointed.  Apple advertising usually hits it out of the park, but in my opinion this had no impact. It didn&#8217;t spend time really communicating any of the capabilities of the device. It all went too fast.  Apple hopefully will create a number of different spots promoting specific capabilities that they believe will drive consumer adoption.  Personally, I still plan on buying one, but if I was on the fence, I don&#8217;t think that this ad would have pushed me over.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/-Dt2qmyeQD8&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en_US&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/-Dt2qmyeQD8&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en_US&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>The only thing Apple has going for it is that their advertising is still miles better than Microsoft&#8217;s advertising and Google hasn&#8217;t bothered at this point.  I must say that I&#8217;m appalled at the Microsoft Windows 7 ads.  I&#8217;ve been meaning to write about this for a while, so as it kind of fits here, let&#8217;s go.  The Windows 7 ads fails along several dimensions:</p>
<ul>
<li>It tries to be a little hip and isn&#8217;t.  It&#8217;s actually that uncomfortable in-between, just a shade better than <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ImyK29QLs_A" target="_blank">Bill Gates wiggling his butt</a>, which may be the all time worst moment in advertising history — or at least Bill Gates&#8217; career.  The whole &#8220;I&#8217;m a PC&#8221;-thing doesn&#8217;t have the warm and fuzzies of a Mac campaign if for no other reason (beyond the abject awkwardness of the spots themselves) that &#8220;PC&#8221; is not a cuddly term the way that &#8220;Mac&#8221; is.  The &#8220;PC&#8221; as a brand of sorts represents nearly every over-structured, unfeeling, bland attribute that one ascribes to the factory-like businesses (to borrow a concept from Seth Godin&#8217;s <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Linchpin-Are-Indispensable-Seth-Godin/dp/1591843162" target="_blank"><em>Linchpin</em></a>) that most people work for, and the very same attributes which most people dislike about their jobs.  They may have well featured the uber-boring &#8220;Knit Knots&#8221; from Disney&#8217;s kid-show the Imagination Movers (see pic) in the ads.<a href="http://www.softwareindustryinsights.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Knit-Knots-Imagination-Movers.jpg"><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-177" title="Knit Knots Imagination Movers" src="http://www.softwareindustryinsights.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Knit-Knots-Imagination-Movers-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a></li>
<li>It portrays mighty Microsoft as clueless about how software should behave, giving consumers credit for every good idea that made it to the gold code.  I understand that they&#8217;re trying to create a connection to consumers, show that they were listening to what didn&#8217;t work in Vista and other prior iterations of the Windows OS.  I just wonder whether a &#8216;<em>mea culpa</em>&#8216; ad that said &#8220;We listened, and here is your new operating system that we think you&#8217;re gonna love&#8221; would have worked better and felt more authentic.  But perhaps Microsoft&#8217;s general inability to admit mistakes is what truly makes this campaign authentic.</li>
<li>Lastly, so many of the features that are highlighted are so basic (paraphrasing: &#8216;I wish it would start up fast and just work&#8217;) and seem to echo the benefits of Mac OSX that it could have had a slightly different, yet crushing ending with each of the people featured saying &#8220;It&#8217;s a Mac&#8221;, rather than &#8220;I&#8217;m a PC&#8221;.  Anytime an ad sets up that way, it portrays a fatal flaw, at least in my opinion.</li>
</ul>
 <img src="http://www.softwareindustryinsights.com/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-feed-statistics/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=176" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.softwareindustryinsights.com/2010/03/the-ipads-first-commerical/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

